About your Search

20130318
20130326
Search Results 0 to 3 of about 4
, of course, is so sensitive to what goes on in the environment. as soon as i read this, and i saw that it trechs from santa barbara to san fransisco, i thought, well, there you go. these are two of the most environmentally sensitive places on the planet. i just don't see how the signs of the economic benefit are worth what would be dangerous to the environment. >> well, let me say a couple things to that, melissa. first, we agree absolutely the environment has to be protected. that's issue number one. any energy source that does grave damage to the environment should not be pursued, and so there needs to be objective analysis of the implications, but there needs to be objective analysis of the economic implications. you can't balance cost and benefits unless you know -- melissa: you look at things like the xl pipelines, there's no objective analysis satisfying unless it's destroying the environment. they are an enemy of shale, fracking, enemy of oil of the there's no report -- if the report came out and said that it wouldn't cause damage, environmentalists wouldn't accept that. ho
and the environment. we can do these projects, prevents these projects will stop a lot of jobs from being created, it is not going to make a development in global emissions. it making no sense to me and the economy. neil: malia. >> i just quickly top say, i understand how we like to take things and combine themm but, i do not think that the only reason why keystone project is not happening is because, barack obama asked his agency this question, to get back to original topic, what i think is really important for us to look forward and you know neil, i don't think that anyone would disagree with you that jobs are important, the problem with laser beam focus you have a society and a lot of things that need to be focused on, laser beaming becomes narrowing, i don't think that is how we' our president or anyone in congress to just have like this one bullet silver bullet solution on what will save the u.s., that is not only thing that u.s. nee right now, we not only have a jobs problem. neil: i think it should be your highest priority. >> it is important for us to look -- >> okay, i understand. >> i d
, but looking at the action, right now suggests we're still in a fairly healthy environment. melissa: you are the first person i have heard say that today. even though we had a down day, shows a little bit of strength in the market because it wasn't even weaker based on this news? speak i think it could have been weaker, and a lot of my looking to buy the dip. two days of weakness. i'm not here to forecast what every wiggle in the market is going to be nor do we think investors should, but with part of your question is fed should investors get in, i am very fond of believing and saying get in or get out, that is gambling on a motive in time, should be a process over time. i do think there is a lot of underinvested investors in the equity on the fence looking for this. you get the money looking into by very quickly. melissa: you're both very fantastic, we really appreciate your time. melissa: here is the "money" question of the day, are you worried this could have been to other countries? you can follow me on twitter. all right, should you be going for the gold? many experts say the gold g
's environment where interest rates, in general, are so low, why take a chance? you know, it's not just on that side of the atlantic. you know, we got 0% interest rates in america. why leave money on deposit in a bank to get 0% when there's inflation, and, you know, nose are the two largest banks in cypress that failed. our two largest banks, bank of america and citi bank have over $2 trillion in total deposits. the fdic has near $25 billion in treasuries. if our largest banks were to fail, we don't have anywhere near reserves to come close to the insurance deposits let alone all deposits. sandra: let's get jordan in here, an analyst in our power panel tonight. jordan, i guess this here is going to be used -- this bailout will be used as a template for future bailouts, and that investors say, well, my money's not safe, i'm going to take it and go somewhere else. do you believe that to be the case? >> right. no, not currently just because when i look at the global markets, if you review the major european nations like germany or france, you don't see the dee tier ration that there's -- d
Search Results 0 to 3 of about 4

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)